Oppositions and Nullity

Is a granted patent hampering your business activity or are you specifically faced with possible patent infringement proceedings or a warning for example? In this case, you have the option of opposing the patent or, where the nine-month opposition period has expired, the option of filing a nullity complaint.

In opposition proceedings, the Opposition Division of either the German Patent and Trademark Office or the European Patent Office examines the patentability of the patent once again in court-like proceedings. It should be noted here that the Opposition Division is independent of the Examining Division. This examination is often based on new prior art introduced into the proceedings by the opponent. This prior art may also comprise products, for example, which were being sold before the date on which the patent was filed, but which the Patent Office failed to take into consideration in the patent grant procedure.


The same applies to patent nullity complaints filed against German patents or European patents with effect for Germany and brought before the German Federal Patent Court in Munich, where a nullity senate consisting of two legal judges and three technical judges again examine the legal validity of the patent granted.

Both the opposition and nullity proceedings initially involve submitting a number of comprehensive written briefs, generally followed by oral proceedings of several hours, at the end of which a decision is usually delivered. With regard to opposition proceedings before the German Patent and Trademark Office or the European Patent Office, decisions at first instance may be contested by appealing the decisions. In the case of patent nullity proceedings, an appeal may be lodged against the German Federal Patent Court’s decision before the German Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe.

As patent infringement and nullity complaints in Germany are heard before separate courts (“separation principle”), good coordination between the patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law in both proceedings, which are often conducted in parallel, is essential. As an opponent or nullity plaintiff, you want to be sure that the patent challenged will be fully revoked as far as possible or that the patent is at least limited so that the patent no longer poses a threat to your products. As the patentee, you want to be sure that, where the patent is limited, it still enjoys sufficient scope of protection, so that your products are sufficiently protected from patent infringements.

To this end, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG’s patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law have been working hand in hand since the firm was founded in 1977 — a fact that clearly sets us apart from the majority of our competitors.
 

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
Partnerschaft mbB

Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte

Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 Munich
Germany

Phone: +49 89 928 05-0
Fax: +49 89 928 05-444
Email: info(at)bardehle.de

Show route

Contacts

News

Interested in our latest Oppositions and Nullity news? Here we go.

UPC News
IP News on
IP Reports, UPC News, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
UPC Fact Check – success rates, revocation rates & grounds for revocation

After more than two years of UPC case law, the sample size of UPC decisions justifies a first UPC…

IP News on
IP Reports, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
G 1/23: Conditions for public availability of a product

In the recent major decision G 1/23, the EBA of the EPO addressed under what conditions a product…

IP News on
IP Reports, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
G 1/24: A win for claim interpretation, a setback for clarity discussions?

After more than 50 years of the EPC, the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) has finally provided…

IP News on
IP Reports, Paris, Oppositions and Nullity, Patent Prosecution, Trademarks, Designs
Free assignment of intellectual property rights in France: be careful!

A recent decision by the Lyon Judicial Court has confirmed a case law with important practical…

IP News on
IP Reports, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity, Patent Prosecution
G1/22 and G2/22: Happy Claimants of Priorities and disappointed Opponents

The recent decisions G1/22 and G22 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA) of the European Patent…

IP News on
IP Reports, Oppositions and Nullity
Referral G 1/23 (T 438/19): clarification on how to construe G 1/92?

This appeal concerns the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition against…

IP Videos

Are you curious about videos on Oppositions and Nullity? Obtain insights and tips from our IP experts here.

UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Quick Tips, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity, Patent Prosecution
Erfinderische Tätigkeit beim EPA & UPC: Wer beide Seiten kennt, hat bessere Karten (2025)
With the establishment of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), the assessment of the inventive step takes…
UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Quick Tips, UPC, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
IP Quick Tip: The limits of UPC cross-border powers
The recent judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in “BSH versus Electrolux”…
UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Quick Tips, UPC, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
IP Quick Tip: How to protect UPC patent litigation with an anti-anti-suit injunction
Anti-suit injunctions can undermine a patent holder’s litigation strategy and delay quick UPC…
UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Quick Tips, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
IP Quick Tip: Does the „long arm“ jurisdiction of the UPC cover the UK? (2025)
For decades, it had been the dream of patent owners to have a one-stop solution for European patent…
UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Insights, UPC, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
IP Insights: Methods of alternative service at the UPC
Let us take a closer look at the service of the statement of claim in UPC proceedings. The principle…
UPC Video
IP Videos on
IP Insights, UPC, UPC Video, Patent Litigation, Oppositions and Nullity
IP Insights: Opposition vs Revocation Actions
What are the differences and pros / cons of UPC revocation actions versus EPO opposition…